My gallery contains photographs ranging from a £100 5mp fuji compact camera bought in 2003, through, a 7Mp 350d and 18-55 kit lens, and ranging to the latest from a 7d and a range of f/1.4 lens' (no L series lens' as i cant afford one)
they're all shot in jpg. and edited after shooting.
i'm a hobbyist photographer, completely self-taught, not a professional, this gallery was not made overnight, but in fact, includes photographs, and manipulations from when i was 17. 7years ago. everything from camera/lens quality to post-processing quality should be timelined if you view the gallery in "browse" and not featured.
and finally, i enjoy, and take criticism well, and i thank you for there's definately a compliment in there <quote> "looks really awful with tons of potential" </quote> I mean, the angles & subjects are there and you seem to be only criticizing the eventual quality of the shots. i can assure you they're shot to the maximum quality of the camera i owned at the time, and saved as maximum quality jpg's. back when i started i would post in 800x600, as it was all the monitor would show effectively. nowadays i post in 1200x800. to my knowledge, and on both my monitors, they're the best quality and colour that i can put forward. but if you have a creative input on how to improve image/colour quality across the gallery or on any individual peice, i'd be more than happy to hear it.